Skip to comments.
Did Clinton Cover-up Iraqi Involvement in 1993 WTC Bombing and TWA 800 and OKC Bombing
September 16, 2001
| Allan J. Favish
Posted on 09/16/2001 12:42:29 PM PDT by AJFavish
http://www.meib.org/articles/0106_ir1.htm The link above is to: Iraqi Complicity in the World Trade Center Bombing and Beyond by Laurie Mylroie, which was published in June of this year and discusses the 1993 bombing of the WTC.
She explains how Bill Clinton intentionally failed to confront Iraq over its complicity in the bombing and other attacks. She supported Clinton in 1992 having been an advisor on Iraq policy to the 1992 Clinton presidential campaign, as you can see at http://admissions.geneseo.edu/cgi-bin/nrap?Roemer98.html
Her September 13, 2001 article in the Wall Street Journal on the recent attack is at http://opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=95001120
In a live interview on Los Angeles radio station KPFK, broadcast around noon today, PST, she stated that Clinton lied about more than sex; he lied about national security.
I wish somebody would ask her about whether she thinks the Clinton administration covered up Iraqi involvment in the murder of those aboard TWA 800 and ordered the military not to pursue the attackers. Or whether there was Iraqi involvement in the Oklahoma City bombing that was not pursued.
Regards,
Allan J. Favish
http://members.aol.com/allanf8702/page1.htm
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clintonscandals; okcbombing; twa800list
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
1
posted on
09/16/2001 12:42:29 PM PDT
by
AJFavish
(ajfavish@att.net)
To: AJFavish
It would appear some believe that
our government may lie to "we the people".
Surely, that can't be possible!
2
posted on
09/16/2001 1:03:20 PM PDT
by
G.Mason
To: G.Mason
X42 would never lie. Never for some self-serving reason. Right?
/sarcasm
To: Diogenesis
Yeah coverup to protect the Gore voter base--DNZ-FUNDING!
To: AJFavish
I'm more convinced than ever that the TWA 800 was an Iraqi stinger missile type operation that was covered up. I believe it was covered up so as to not allow the terrorists to use it for propaganda purposes and also to not panic the American people.
To: Diogenesis
Yeah coverup to protect the Gore voter base--DNZ-Hllary-Sharpton-Waters-Reno-Jackson-FUNDING!
To: Diogenesis
Yeah coverup to protect the Gore voter base--DNZ-Hillary-Sharpton-Waters-Reno-Jackson-PLO-bin laden--FUNDING!
To: AJFavish
Maybe TWA 800 was the reason the Air Force One threat was taken seriously. Bush can't just come out and say Clinton is a pig without threatening national security.
8
posted on
09/16/2001 1:50:49 PM PDT
by
marbren
To: AJFavish
I believe it was Wednesday, but when Clinton was allowed back in this country, he went to NYC and ran into a FoxNews reporter. I wish I'd had my VCR taping it, the reporter asked Clinton if he didn't feel somewhat responsible. Of course all he did was dance around the question, but I gotta admire the reporter.(though the question of reponsibility comes 8 years too late)
9
posted on
09/16/2001 1:59:56 PM PDT
by
orlop9
To: AJFavish
I just read an article from a London paper (1999)on another thread, which claims that Bin Laden had a cell in Albania that was playing a part in Kosovo. This would mean that Clinton was fighting on the same side as Bin Laden in Kosovo.
10
posted on
09/16/2001 2:05:23 PM PDT
by
Eva
To: Michael12001
bttt
To: Michael12001
The previous thread I was trying to say---Serbia wars, both sides could be 100% wrong...we could quibble about it--the %'s!
To: truth_eagle
I tend to agree with you. We have compromised our principles from the day that we let Arafat hijack 3 American airliners and burn them to the ground in the desert. By refusing to meet the challenge head-on, we have allowed the terrorists to continue these acts for 25 years. The Beruit bombing, Khobar Towers bombing, Cole bombing, Pan Am 103 were but a few of the increasingly bolder acts of violence against us. This time it must stop.
To: AJFavish
The Clinton Administration actually bombed Iraq for nothing more than evidence of a plot to assassinate ex-prez Bush, so there is no reason to suppose that Clinton covered up for other Iraqi guilt. The investigation of the 1993 WTC bombing uncovered a primarily Egyptian conspiracy and several of the guilty parties are now rotting in prison. THe suggestion that Iraq had something to do with the Murrah Building bombing is such obvious hokum that it is pretty obvious that the author of this essay has a heavy axe to grind. The Taliban were heavily subsidized by the Reagan and Bush administrations, and if the Clinton Administration failed to take aggressive steps against it, it was not for lack of trying - when Clinton ordered various Bin Laden assets bombed, the Republicans started whining that he had bombed a poor innocent aspirin factory.
14
posted on
09/16/2001 8:13:05 PM PDT
by
DonQ
To: DonQ
BTW, do you think a missile was NOT the cause of the crash of TWA 800?
15
posted on
09/17/2001 7:54:35 AM PDT
by
1234
To: 1234
bttt
16
posted on
09/17/2001 7:52:13 PM PDT
by
AJFavish
(ajfavish@att.net)
To: AJFavish
Bttt
17
posted on
09/18/2001 3:39:08 PM PDT
by
AJFavish
(ajfavish@att.net)
To: 1234
#15: Response?
18
posted on
09/25/2001 1:32:16 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: AJFavish
This certainly makes sense. My God.
19
posted on
09/25/2001 1:35:36 PM PDT
by
Osinski
To: DonQ
when Clinton ordered various Bin Laden assets bombed, the Republicans started whining that he had bombed a poor innocent aspirin factory. Like the scum in his sink, so you speak this way.
That, amigo, was murder by CinC.
20
posted on
09/25/2001 1:39:11 PM PDT
by
bvw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson